Insurance CIOs Speak Out
Insurance Networking News, October 7, 2009
Economic challenges continue to plague insurers, affecting their day-to-day decisions, their corporate objectives and even as their budget projections for 2010 and beyond. With IT budgets are flat or slightly up, this leaves CIOs with even more important decisions to make and policies to set. CIOs, tech vendors and industry experts gathered at IASA’s annual EDGE conference mid-September to share their thoughts about these issues.
At one of the IASA EDGE Executive Discussion Breakout Sessions, Steven Boyd, CIO of Arrowhead General Insurance Agency, led a candid discussion among a group of insurance technology professionals trying to tackle economic and business challenges affecting IT spend.
While the majority of the industry experts who attended the conference expect 2011 budgets to go up, they confirmed that 2010 budgets will remain the same, and where they spend that limited amount of money will vary. Matthew Josefowicz, director of insurance at Novarica, said IT is taking on projects that have quick return, and is heavily evaluating systems and processes right now.
Virtualization and Cloud Computing
One area in which insurers are investing is virtualization, Josefowicz said. “There is a lot of server virtualization going on,” he says. “Many people are turning their mainframes to Linux.”
One such company investigating virtualization is Princeton Insurance. “We are in the planning stages—we are looking at which servers are best to virtualize,” said Darby O’Neill, the insurer’s CIO. “The company we hired has to show cost savings and results.”
Cost savings is important to Tower Hill Insurance Group, which has a large VM farm, said Brian Elsmore, CIO. However, he warned, “If you are not careful, it’s cheap on the front end, but it can become very expensive on the back end.”
The discussion about virtualization naturally progressed into talk about cloud computing, which ISCS Inc. president Andy Scurto claimed will be the next “dot-com.” “Insurers will embrace [cloud computing] and it’s safe to say they are not that crazy.”
O’Neill, who said her No. 1 priority is data quality and integration, is not quite ready to embrace it. “There is no way I am putting my data out there,” she said, which was accompanied by a few nods of agreement from other CIOs in the room.
Boyd, however, sees some value in it. “This model is good for small to mid-sized companies versus an on-premise solution,” he said.
Novarica’s Josefowicz echoed the thought. “Comparatively, the power of the on-demand model has a lot of appeal, especially when you are doing multi-year loss runs,” he said. “You can ship data out and get it back. Larger cloud W.2.0—where you ship some here and some there—is not being embraced by insurance companies, and I don’t expect it to be.”
Open Source
A hot topic that emerged within the group was Open Source technologies, and their potential as the foundation for viable development efforts. Tower Hill’s Elsmore said much of its development is being done using Open Source. But, Dave Hanley, VP operations and business development at Insurance Systems Inc., said the industry needed to know more about the technology’s reputation.
“Open Source has the reputation as being for the yogurt-and-nut-loving, tree-hugging crowd,” answered Phil Hargrove, insurance technology adviser at Vertafore Inc. “Yet, all the brilliant shops are contributing to this,” he said. “IBM is even embracing it. The fact is that it is well-tested software.”
Craig Lowenthal, EVP and CIO at New York Marine and General Insurance Co., said his comfort level was challenged using Open Source. Hargrove suggested that IT execs should institute a policy as to how they will use it (i.e. governance). “There are also copyright laws coming out, so you need to control how it’s implemented,” he said. “Know what you are getting into.”
Legacy Systems
Arrowhead’s Boyd posed the question about legacy systems, and whether insurers currently are replacing or maintaining those systems. The consensus among session attendees was that they are working with what they have.
“You want to leverage any investments you make,” Lowenthal said. “You have to watch maintenance costs. Plus, when you [make a huge systems change] and try to shove something down peoples’ throats—they run away.”
Boyd agreed. “It’s important not to shoehorn something. We have a Wiki on our IS system, and it ended up holding hundreds of documents so we said ship it (porting into the legacy system).”
For more information on related topics, visit the following channels:
- Agent Network
- Claims
- Compliance
- Customer Service
- Data Management
- Distribution
- Enterprise Technologies
- Insurance Network
- Outsourcing
- Policy Administration
- Risk Management
- Underwriting
