5 Misconceptions that Undermine Agile Adoptions

Rick Raisinghani
Insurance Experts' Forum, September 26, 2013

Agile is a widely accepted software development methodology, well suited for business use because it allows organizations to gain a better understanding software projects and reduce the overall risk of software development. It is critical that users thoroughly understand the agile process in order to avoid common pitfalls that can cause delays.

Nevertheless, flawed agile implementations can still result in a failure to fully realize benefits, notably significant stakeholder engagement and early, predictable software delivery. Flawed implementations often result in misconceptions that agile methodology is inadequate, when the true problem lies within the developmental stages, not within the methodology’s design.

Here are the top five misconceptions that undermine a successful agile adoption:

1. Revising previous tests isn’t common practice.

As the team repeats multiple work measurements, there probably will be a need to revise earlier tests. These revisions should not come as a surprise and are a necessary component of continuously improving the software. However, to realize efficient adoption of agile that is in budget and on time, the project team needs to establish scope boundaries and leverage quarterly targets.

2. Implementing agile doesn’t require documentation of development.

All team members must understand the changes that took place during software development. Through effective documentation of these changes, stakeholder engagement will increase and common product testing delays will decrease, if not disappear entirely. Documentation doesn’t have to be exhaustive, but tracking the progress of software development and its changes is critical for the team to understand the status of each requirement and any succeeding changes.

3. Authorizing agile will guarantee a project’s success.

Agile methodology by itself is not the only or even the main guarantor of a software development projects’ success. Team member skills and availability are the core foundation of any project’s outcome. An organization must be prepared to muster adequate resources during agile, which may require a significant investment of both time and money. However, appropriate investment is crucial, as having the right decision makers in place will promote quick turnaround and successful development.

4. Testing in agile isn’t necessary.

Testing in agile is critical to project quality. Testing allows for identification of defects within development work, which in turn leads to more effective resolution of unexpected defects. The key here is to make frequent test cases and document the findings.

5. Planning isn’t critical in the agile methodology.

Design can and will change as the project evolves, but a high-level plan from leadership is critical from the start. Without this, organizations will struggle to move forward with the project, which will cause delays and/or an unintended direction. Development work on the project should not begin until a solid plan is created.

In conclusion, incorporating agile methodology in software development is not necessarily easy, but the benefits — a quick and efficient process — are worth it. Employing a solid combination of knowledge, tools and experience is what allows organizations to leverage agile principles in a way that supports business needs and provides a solid foundation for promoting them throughout the organization.

Rick Raisinghani is a director with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

Readers are encouraged to respond to Rick using the “Add Your Comments” box below. He can also be reached at

This blog was exclusively written for Insurance Networking News. It may not be reposted or reused without permission from Insurance Networking News.

The opinions of bloggers on do not necessarily reflect those of Insurance Networking News.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Insurance Networking News, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Blog Archive

On Thanking the Regulator … Really

The Financial Conduct Authority is demanding higher standards of consumer protection from insurers, which could lead to greater customer engagement and understanding.

Competing with the Coasts for Tech Talent

Are heartland-based insurers at a recruiting disadvantage for tech skills?

Putting Your Investments Where Your Transformation Is: Part 2: Optimizing Your IT Investments Portfolio

Sam Medina continues a 3-part series on Transforming the IT Investment Budget in order to fund new programs and initiatives without the necessity of additional capital expense.

Boosting Performance with Integrated Underwriting Tools

A unified, comprehensive platform can help underwriters perform their jobs more efficiently and profitably.

Apply Mindfulness to Leadership

Managers can benefit from applying this theory both to their career aspirations as well as to interactions and expectations of staff.

Opinion: Halbig Decision Creates New Level of Uncertainty for Obamacare

Time will tell if the Halbig decision remains viable. But in the meantime, a new level of uncertainty has been injected into the process.