Comparison Shopping Grows Even as the Economy Improves

Chad Mitchell
Insurance Experts' Forum, October 22, 2009

Carrie Burns recently wrote about a survey from showing that 83% of U.S. consumers are planning to try to reduce their auto insurance premium in the next six months. Economic indicators show the U.S. economy is slowly stabilizing, and all signs point toward a continued improvement in 2010. Yet the survey shows consumers will continue to comparison shop even as the economy improves.

Forrester’s Q3 2009 Insurance and Investments consumer survey shows that 42% of all U.S. online adults were influenced by online comparison-shopping when applying for auto insurance. In fact, online comparison-shopping sites influenced more than five out of 10 U.S. Gen Y and Gen X consumers (see Figure 1).

Why Comparison Shopping Will Grow After The Economy Improves

There are several reasons why online comparison-shopping continues to increase and impact the marketplace:

Emerging comparison-shopping advertising. Progressive has used a comparison-shopping theme in its mass advertising for years. The firm effectively communicates the value of choice, and the ability for consumers to receive multiple quotes. Esurance takes that one-step further and is now positioning itself as the online insurance destination comparison shopping site. It not only offers comparison rates, but it allows the consumer to purchase directly from other carriers at I predict a major shift in 2010 as online comparison agencies follow a similar theme. The major issue is getting the consumer’s attention. Esurance and other online insurance agencies must compete with the deep advertising war chests of GEICO and Progressive. These firms must learn how to optimize media-mix spend across interactive channels, including paid search and display advertising in order to profitability acquire online comparison shoppers. These firms must offer assisted-service, like click-to-call and click-to-chat, enabling customers to start online and then purchase through a licensed call center representative. Forrester data mirrors this, finding that 48% of online auto insurance applicants start a quote online, but purchase through an offline channel (agent or call center).

Customer and agent fatigue from aggregators. Customers and agents are tired of poor experiences through lead aggregator sites. The customer believes he is comparison-shopping, but cannot purchase insurance through the site. Instead, the customer completes a form and is bombarded with e-mails and cold calls from aggressive agents. The customer’s information is typically sold six to eight times, creating an irate customer and poor lead quality for agents. Aggregators like are changing their business model to improve the customer and agent experience. Insweb recently launched to deliver a better online comparison-shopping experience—giving the consumer more control over what personal information is required for a ballpark quote. Agents will be happier, too, because Insweb is limiting the amount of times the consumer lead is sold to carriers and agents.

Entrance of comparative raters. Consumer choice and transparency are the key benefits of comparison-shopping for consumers. On the other hand, the private passenger auto insurance market continues to commoditize the product, creating downward price pressure on margins and profitability for carriers. Choice is also the driving mission for independent insurance agents who continue to lose business to direct writers and comparison sites. Independent agents are fighting back with the help of comparative rating technology vendors like EZ Lynx and IBQ. EZ Lynx created an online, direct-to-consumer lead-generation portal for independent agents called Carriers like The Hartford, Grange Insurance, Progressive, Safeco and MetLife are already advertising on the site. Consumers can complete a form online and receive the independent agents “comparison” shops to find the best rate. EZ Lynx and IBQ are also exposing their comparative rater technology direct-to-consumers through independent agents’ local sites. This gives the independent agent a 24/7 online store portal, effectively creating online comparison-shopping through their local site.

The major question remains for carriers, agents and comparison sites: Are online comparison shoppers really good customers for your book of business? I would not invest substantially to acquire a customer who is shopping for lower rates every six months.

Methods including online behavioral targeting and real-time segmentation and analytics will help some interactive leaders filter consumers who are switchers versus loyalists. But the end game is tighter margins and increased cost per acquisition. Those are not the fundamentals many insurance executives want to hear as they try to grow their businesses in 2010.

Do you agree or disagree?

Chad Mitchell is a senior analyst with Forrester Research. He covers mobile and social media strategies in insurance, acquisition, cross-sell and retention marketing strategies, comparative raters, online guided selling tools, emerging Web and call center technologies for sales and service, agent portals for marketing and underwriting, and the best practices of leading multichannel firms. Aditionally, he advises leading insurers on best practices for public and secure insurance Web sites—analyzing functionality for quoting, policy administration and claims.

Comments (1)

Interesting article and survey insights. Company's that can not differentiate themselves from the ever commoditizing pact will continue to loose custonmers to lower priced competitors. Those that committ themselves to continually provideing their customers with a valuable ownership experience have a much better chance of building a profitable book of business. Few companies invest to keep the cusotmers that they spend so much to acquire.

Posted by: mloffa | October 23, 2009 10:33 AM

Report this Comment

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Insurance Networking News, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Blog Archive

With Google Favoring Mobile, Will The Industry Take it Seriously?

Google’s search engine will now will favor mobile friendly content over traditional website content; within the insurance industry, the greatest initial impact is likely to be felt by insurance distributors.

Why Some Technologists Get Cold Feet on Mobile

There are those who believe that favoring one channel or mode over another will lead to even more silos and dysfunction than we already have in many organizations.

Insurance IT Spending and Budgeting Benchmarks

New research from Novarica highlights areas of concern and offers insights on insurers spending and budgeting decisions.

Enterprise Mobilemania Continues Unabated

More than half of companies are spending more on developing mobile applications -- but are they more efficient?

Why Insurers Need More Than a Policy Admin System

For some insurers, not being able to handle the volume of quotes that are being submitted to them means leaving significant money on the table.

The Pitfalls of Using Assembly Line Methods to Create Software

Most of the time, when the business needs IT, it is for custom software development, just like creating a concept car.