Enterprising Developments

Is It Worth Moving 3,000 Mainframe Programs to a PC Environment?

Joe McKendrick
Insurance Experts' Forum, May 3, 2013

Is it worth the trouble for an insurance company with 2,900 programs covering core applications of policy, billing, claims and membership systems ever move off the mainframe?

Yes, it is, writes Bert Young, VP of IT at the South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, in a recent issue of Baseline.

SFBCIC's migration off the mainframe was a considerably significant project. Though Young didn't provide specifics on costs or time spent, one can assume they were significant as well. The effort is delivering impressive returns, however.

The company's COBOL-based logic was replicated within Windows and .NET distributed servers, and data moved to SQL Server. Along with the programs, 926 million records were migrated.

Young reports that the former mainframe programs, now running in a Windows/.NET environment, have been greatly streamlined, and up to 600 programs were consolidated. The company is saving about $620,000 a year, Young adds. There is also more capacity for testing cycles.

For all these arguments in favor of migrating off a mainframe to distributed servers, there are many IT executives just as likely to argue in favor of a more centralized consolidated system as a mainframe. Mainframe boxes these days — primarily IBM's System x — are no longer big, mysterious, lumbering machines. They are actually a collection of expandable technologies and capabilities, not only running traditional mainframe programs (anything that sits on CICS), but also Linux, Unix and Windows applications within multiple partitions or as an add-on specialty engine. It could be argued that it's better to have one of these boxes in the corner of the data center than 1,000 distributed servers sitting all over the place.

For SFBCIC, moving to distributed systems worked out well for the business. But every insurance company has different requirements. Maybe the mainframe versus distributed server argument will even be a moot point for some as the cloud option gains steam.

Joe McKendrick is an author, consultant, blogger and frequent INN contributor specializing in information technology.

Readers are encouraged to respond to Joe using the “Add Your Comments” box below. He can also be reached at joe@mckendrickresearch.com.

This blog was exclusively written for Insurance Networking News. It may not be reposted or reused without permission from Insurance Networking News.

The opinions of bloggers on www.insurancenetworking.com do not necessarily reflect those of Insurance Networking News.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Insurance Networking News, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Blog Archive

3 Reasons DevOps Matters

Every insurer needs to compete on products and information turned around in light-speed fashion.

Coordinate Coverages to Manage Social Media Exposures

The bottom line is that no one policy will cover all the exposures in the social media realm.

The Internet of Things: Helping Insurers Make Better-Informed Decisions about Risk

The IoT is a major game changer for the insurance industry, and will likely affect every part of the insurance value chain. After all, insurance is data-driven, and that’s exactly what the IoT can deliver—relevant, actionable, real-time data that can provide an accurate picture of what is being—or may be—insured.

Software-Defined Everything

What does it take to virtualize all the key components in your data center?

On Thanking the Regulator … Really

The Financial Conduct Authority is demanding higher standards of consumer protection from insurers, which could lead to greater customer engagement and understanding.

Competing with the Coasts for Tech Talent

Are heartland-based insurers at a recruiting disadvantage for tech skills?