Editors' Cuts

Pinning Down Success

Bill Kenealy
Insurance Experts' Forum, October 5, 2010

The fallout from the financial crisis and the prolonged soft market is keeping many in the insurance industry fixated on the tactical moves necessary to keep their heads above water. This makes a long-term assessment of how a company succeeds over the course of decades still a fruitful exercise.

Recently, at the National Association of Mutual Insurance Compaines Annual Convention in San Diego, two speakers took the long view on what makes a company successful.

Best-selling business writer and Stanford professor Jim Collins said that all companies, irrespective of industry, have the ability to achieve greatness if they make a conscious decision to do so. “Greatness is a function of choice and discipline,” he said.

Part of this discipline is managing growth in a responsible way. Collins cited a maxim from Hewlett Packard founder David Packard that the indigestion caused by not accounting for sudden growth was a bigger threat to companies than slow starvation due to a lack of growth. Much of the problem with rapid growth, Collins said, happens when the pace of growth exceeds a company’s ability to put the best people in critical positions.

Indeed, Collins said it’s hard to overstate the value of human capital when investigating what makes certain companies thrive and others die. He highlighted the example of Darwin Smith, former CEO of Kimberly-Clarke. Smith boldly put the company on a different path (some say he bet the ranch) when he decided to jettison the company’s century-old sawmills to focus solely on consumer products. Given the regulatory realities of the insurance industry, an insurance executive making a move as radical as Smith’s seems highly improbable. Yet the willingness of a top executive to reexamine and overturn long-running assumptions is illustrative.

To the contrary, in his presentation on the life cycle of insurance companies, Robert Hartwig, president of the Insurance Information Institute, stressed the value of consistency.

Hartwig noted that while it’s rare for businesses, like people, to live more than 100 years, the insurance industry has great deal of companies that are thriving past the 100 year mark. Indeed, some 650 members of NAMIC have reached that distinction. Hartwig said that three characteristics were most prominent among the centenarians: they were family owned, they were geographically modest, and they concentrated on one core product or business. “Diversification leads to complexity,” Hartwig said.

So how does Hartwig's endorsement of simplicity reconcile with Collin's admonition to rethink core principles? Collins readily admits that insurance is something of an odd duck among industries in that conservative business practices are endemic and often mandated by law. Hartwig also noted that it’s probably not a coincidence that two-thirds of insurers more than 100 years old have a mutual structure. “Mutualization leads to long-term thinking that is rare in the business world,” Collins said.

This complexity versus simplicity debate will likely only metastasize in light of pending regulatory changes. For example, the pending Solvency II regulations in the European Union will award more diversified operations with lower capital requirements. Post financial crisis, regulators and rating agencies here may well follow suit.  The prospect of smaller insurers merging to stay in regulators good graces seems an odd perverse outcome of a financial crisis that was caused interconnectedness and sheer size of certain financial services firms.

Whether insurers choose to seek growth through diversity or instead refocus on their current niche and improve core operations such as underwriting, they need to pick a path and stick to it. “The signature of mediocrity is chronic inconsistency,” Collins said.

Bill Kenealy is a senior editor with Insurance Networking News.

Readers are encouraged to respond to Bill by using the “Add Your Comments” box below. He can also be reached at william.kenealy@sourcemedia.com.

This blog was exclusively written for Insurance Networking News. It may not be reposted or reused without permission from Insurance Networking News.

The opinions of bloggers on www.insurancenetworking.com do not necessarily reflect those of Insurance Networking News.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Insurance Networking News, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Blog Archive

Living with the Internet of Things (and crowd funding)

The Internet of Things has it’s teething problems.

6 Technology Priorities for Individual Life Carriers

While many aging, generally mainframe-based systems, remain capable of supporting basic policy processing and accounting functions, the costs associated with enhancing them are becoming increasingly problematic.

With Google Favoring Mobile, Will The Industry Take it Seriously?

Google’s search engine will now will favor mobile friendly content over traditional website content; within the insurance industry, the greatest initial impact is likely to be felt by insurance distributors.

Why Some Technologists Get Cold Feet on Mobile

There are those who believe that favoring one channel or mode over another will lead to even more silos and dysfunction than we already have in many organizations.

Insurance IT Spending and Budgeting Benchmarks

New research from Novarica highlights areas of concern and offers insights on insurers spending and budgeting decisions.

Enterprise Mobilemania Continues Unabated

More than half of companies are spending more on developing mobile applications -- but are they more efficient?