Return of the Guru

Interest in Clean Technology Dims Among Venture Capitalists

Ara Trembly
Insurance Experts' Forum, October 18, 2010

I’ve always thought that if you really want to know what’s going on with the economy, you should look to the people who study companies hardest and make the riskiest investments—venture capitalists.

Thus, I find it interesting that a recent PriceWaterhouseCoopers and National Venture Capital Association study (as reported by Associated Press) found that venture capitalists poured less money into U.S. start-ups in the third quarter of 2010 and split this among more companies, “signaling that investors are trying to be more economical with their funds.”

That’s really not terribly surprising. The U.S. economy continues to suck wind, unemployment (even at the artificially lowered numbers the federal government will admit to) remains disturbingly high, and people are still losing jobs. The risk is greater, so the prudent investor is being more careful with his or her discretionary funds.

According to the study, start-up investments declined 7% to $4.8 billion in the July-September period, compared with $5.2 billion invested during the same three-month period in 2009. A total of 780 start-ups received funding during the quarter—9% more than the 716 companies that received investments last year.

But here’s the really interesting part. The study says that much of the decline stemmed from a drop in large investments in clean technology. “Funding in clean-tech start-ups, which include alternative energy, recycling, conservation and power supply companies, has been mercurial lately. It fell every quarter last year compared with the previous year, but has been climbing this year—until the third quarter,” says the report.

These numbers confirm for me an idea that I’ve held for the past year or so; namely that while clean technologies are a trendy investment that makes the investor feel like a benefactor, they are not always particularly profitable. It’s all well and good to take a flyer on some “green” technology that has conservationists and environmental advocates oohing and ahing, but the bottom line for venture capitalists is capital. The apparent message here is that—at least at this point in time—there’s just not enough gold in them thar “green” hills.

This doesn’t necessarily mean that insurers and others with facilities and systems should give up on the idea of being “green.” It does mean, however, that it takes more than oohs and ahs to make a sound investment—or a sound strategy for a company. Getting carried away by a cause, no matter how noble, must be balanced by sound fiscal judgment.

The study also notes that by industry, software start-ups got the most funding in the quarter ($1 billion) while biotechnology start-ups came in second, garnering $943.7 million. Investments in clean technology, which was higher last quarter at $1.5 billion than any quarter since the study began keeping track of investments in 1995, fell to $625.2 million—a drop of 32% from the same quarter in 2009.

So the other message is that software remains a hot technology investment area, which is a hopeful sign for our industry, in which insurance-specific applications have had stellar success. Maybe it’s not as politically correct as the “green” concept, but every company has a duty to do the right thing financially by its investors.

On the other hand, if there’s a green technology out there that can demonstrate solid and sustained profitability, we should all be looking at that. We can only hope that sound judgment will prevail among our investors and within our organizations.

Ara C. Trembly ( is the founder of Ara Trembly, The Tech Consultant, and a longtime observer of technology in insurance and financial services.

Readers are encouraged to respond to Ara using the “Add Your Comments” box below. He can also be reached at

This blog was exclusively written for Insurance Networking News. It may not be reposted or reused without permission from Insurance Networking News.

The opinions of bloggers on do not necessarily reflect those of Insurance Networking News.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Insurance Networking News, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Blog Archive

The Other Auto Insurance Telematics Shoe Drops

Progressive's decision to charge Snapshot drivers more if their driving data indicates higher risk has started the industry down a road of data-driven adverse selection.

Core Transformation – Configuring in the Rain

The whole point of core transformation is that changes at the micro level can be used as a stimulus for changes at the macro level.

6 Ways to Develop a Productive IT-Business Dialog

Relationship management 101 for keeping IT and business on the same page.

Unified Digital Strategy: Succeeding in the Digital Revolution

A unified digital strategy recognizes that all business strategies and technologies touch the customer in some way and that a one-size-fits-all channel model is obsolete.

Agile and Continuous Delivery in a Regulated Environment

Just because a development team is doing continuous delivery or packaging releases into two-week sprints doesn’t mean that code is being moved to production.

Dealing with the COBOL Brain Drain

Documentation on aging systems often is akin to tribal knowledge, and the potential for things to go bump in the night increases as these environments face generational transition.