4 Keys to Self-Service Adoption

Ed Fenwick
Insurance Experts' Forum, April 27, 2010

Self-service is a growing strategy for more and more insurance companies. The push has its roots primarily in expense reduction but, increasingly, it has an element of responding to customer demand. However, there is one significant issue haunting the business case for most of these efforts—adoption rate.

Recent studies have shown that durable adoption rates in our industry are hovering around 15%, with some achieving as high as 25%. That is either good or bad, depending on what the going-in expectation was. Either way, it is a long way from shutting down the call center and pocketing that entire expense savings.

So what are the barriers to adoption and what can be done to overcome them? 


A mixed bag of capabilities with varying degrees of usability and complexity will kill adoption. The chaos you often experience as a consumer with Web self-service is rarely a technology issue; rather, it is almost certainly the lack of a single, coherent approach and leadership in the organization that put it together.

Cross-functional process ownership is minimal table stakes for development of an adoptable self-service capability. If the self-service is aimed at producers or agents, ownership across the various functions is even more important. If it is simple to get their underwriting status but impossible to figure out a commission issue, they will default to the phone, where they can have all of their questions answered—even if it takes a transfer or two.

Customer ROI

The organization’s ROI on self-service will never happen until the customer’s ROI is high. Customer ROI is a simple formula—the certainty of benefit has to exceed the anticipated effort; the higher that ratio, the faster and more durable the adoption of self-service will be. That formula has to work with each and every engagement, from sign up to initial use, and through repeated use. Companies with self-service capabilities are getting about one-third of their new customers to sign up, but lose more than half who never move into the user category. At every aspect of the offering, tight focus needs to be given to the customers’ perception of benefit and anticipated effort to maximize adoption.

Cross-Service Channel Consistency

A consistent way to access and use all of your service channels will help self-service adoption, but the consistent way has to be customer-oriented and easy. Requiring a policy number (a 10-digit, random set of numbers) to access services is not customer-oriented or easy. Opposed to completing a transaction over the phone, the Web site requires you to download a form—neither consistent nor easy. Companies with high self-service adoption rates have worked hard on these consistency and ease-of-use issues. For example, at one company, customers can choose their unique user ID and password, which are used to access any service channel. The ease of use encourages customers’ utilization of self-service systems.


One airline made a bold decision when they implemented self-service kiosks. They took people from behind the counter working the traditional long queue of passengers, and moved them out to the kiosks, helping customers learn how to use them. The traditional service lines grew longer, but self-service adoption took off. This airline staffed the kiosk training heavily for over a year after introduction, and as a result, they have the highest adoption rate of any airline and the shortest, lowest-staffed traditional service stations of any U.S. carrier.

Your self-service strategy has to include strong capabilities for providing live help. In the short run, this may drive up call center demand but it is critical to high adoption rates.


Self-service can work but it takes a solid, comprehensive approach. In successful companies, it is not just an IT initiative; rather, it is more about bringing together process management and customer experience management—that is the winning formula.

Ed Fenwick is a SVP for The Robert E. Nolan Co., a management consulting firm specializing in the insurance industry.

Readers are encouraged to respond to Ed using the “Add Your Comments” box below.

The opinions of bloggers on do not necessarily reflect those of Insurance Networking News.

Comments (1)

a good read. thank you for this. got some nice insight.

over the years i have noticed the training aspect of airlines self service desks. a massive improvement on my travel experiences. the people there helping made a difference. but that costs money. tools on the web can seriously impact airlines self service desks at the airports. is a great tool. it can really help those kiosks at the airport and cut costs too.

Posted by: Stefanie A | October 15, 2012 9:55 AM

Report this Comment

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Insurance Networking News, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Blog Archive

With Google Favoring Mobile, Will The Industry Take it Seriously?

Google’s search engine will now will favor mobile friendly content over traditional website content; within the insurance industry, the greatest initial impact is likely to be felt by insurance distributors.

Why Some Technologists Get Cold Feet on Mobile

There are those who believe that favoring one channel or mode over another will lead to even more silos and dysfunction than we already have in many organizations.

Insurance IT Spending and Budgeting Benchmarks

New research from Novarica highlights areas of concern and offers insights on insurers spending and budgeting decisions.

Enterprise Mobilemania Continues Unabated

More than half of companies are spending more on developing mobile applications -- but are they more efficient?

Why Insurers Need More Than a Policy Admin System

For some insurers, not being able to handle the volume of quotes that are being submitted to them means leaving significant money on the table.

The Pitfalls of Using Assembly Line Methods to Create Software

Most of the time, when the business needs IT, it is for custom software development, just like creating a concept car.