Celent Says

Quantifying the Promise of End User Maintenance

Mike Fitzgerald
Insurance Experts' Forum, September 13, 2010

One of the frequently referenced benefits of transitioning to a modern automation platform is the ability to have some amount of system maintenance moved out of programming areas. In some organizations, this means having business analysts make changes to systems; in others, end users in business units perform selected modifications. Lower cost and shorter cycle times are claimed as the advantages of this approach.

However, it has always been difficult to quantify this opportunity. During a recent consulting project, we discovered a technique that helped clarify such a benefit.

The client was a large insurer with multiple divisions. The unit in which we were working used a 40-year-old legacy administration system. In a sister operation, a modern, rules-based system performed a similar function. We asked a business analyst who worked with the modern system to review the current outstanding work list of the legacy system and make a determination about which items would be handled without programming assistance in the more modern system. After reviewing 70 items, he determined that 28% of them could be accomplished without involving programming resources.

While this is not a controlled experiment, nor a statistically relevant sample, it did allow the client to more effectively gauge the opportunity.  It allowed us to have a much more meaningful discussion of a future state since we could reference actual work items and outline how they might be accomplished differently.

If your team is looking for a way to quantify the promise of end user maintenance, search across your organization to see if an existing experience with modern solutions in other parts of the company can contribute a focused and meaningful perspective.

This blog has been reprinted with permission from Celent.

Mike Fitzgerald is a senior analyst in Celent's insurance practice, and can be reached at mfitzgerald@celent.com.

Readers are encouraged to respond to Mike using the “Add Your Comments” box below.

The opinions posted in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Insurance Networking News or SourceMedia.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Insurance Networking News, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Blog Archive

Global Supply Chain, Local Problem

As a technology provider, your clientís ability to deliver products and services to their customers, when and where they need them, is at the heart of their business success.

Legacy Systems Are Increasingly a Competitive Handicap

Legacy systems, while reliable, increasingly hold insurers back, a new study finds

From Her to Watson, and What’s Next?

Imagine a learning system that can replace the performance of your best employee to provide the same level of support across the organization.

Five Reasons to Software-Define Your Operations

It may be possible to provision key services with the click of a mouse, but benefits go well beyond that.

3 Policy Admin Conversion Considerations

Insurers would be wise to learn these lessons before formulating a strategy to convert policies to a new policy administration system.

Boyle’s 4th Law - Response Time Matters!

Why many companies donít do a good job of measuring the thing that clients value the most.