The Promise of End User System Maintenance

Mike Fitzgerald
Insurance Experts' Forum, March 5, 2010

One of the benefits of investing in modern, configurable software that is often sought is the ability to move creation and maintenance of systems to the business areas. The premise is that transferring these functions to users will increase quality and reduce costs. In Celent’s discussions with insurers and observations, this is often a goal that is more aspiration than realization.  

Our research has begun to quantify the extent to which functions are transferring within various solutions. For example, the graph below details the responses from U.S. insurers using a standalone rating engine when asked what percentage of work is being performed in their business areas:



Surprisingly, tasks to configure interfaces with third-party vendors (CLUE. MVRs, etc.) are performed at a very high level (83%). Not surprisingly, deployment to production is often held in the IT area. (For more details, reference the report: US Property/Casualty Rating Systems: ABCD Vendor View, 2009)

We are continuing to collect such data across different software platforms in order to quantify the “promise” of end user maintenance.

This blog has been reprinted with permission from Celent. Mike Fitzgerald is a senior analyst in Celent's insurance practice, and can be reached at mfitzgerald@celent.com.

The opinions posted in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Insurance Networking News or SourceMedia.

Comments (2)

Mike,

Curious to know if your research contemplates how many IT personnel are transferring into the business units along with the implementation of various solutions? Have seen this with some clients and curious how widespread it is as an industry trend.

Regards,

John

Posted by: Chevy | March 19, 2010 11:06 AM

Report this Comment


Can you define users in the business units? Are they underwriters, business analysts, IT staff, or all of the above? The industry needs to be careful not to create redundancy and chaos by making it too easy for staff to make changes. And I'm not anti Web 2.0.

Posted by: Robert R | March 6, 2010 1:06 PM

Report this Comment

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Insurance Networking News, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Blog Archive

The Pitfalls of Using Assembly Line Methods to Create Software

Most of the time, when the business needs IT, it is for custom software development, just like creating a concept car.

Wearables and Gamification in Life Insurance Goes Mainstream?

With so many U.S. households still uninsured, insurers are going have to try new things to re-position their product, focusing on consumer needs.

Will John Hancock Vitality Transform Insurance?

The Vitality program integrates this information directly into the rewards, giving you credit for the exercise, just by virtue of reporting it.

Why Customers Should Want Innovative Insurers

At a time when confidence in the insurance industry has been compromised, innovative companies can break the mold.

Five Ways to a Positive User Experience

The user experience can make or break an application. Here are five ways to measure whether itís positive or negative.

Innovation & Insight Day Recap

The Insurance Team recognized fifteen model banks across five categories: Digital; Data Mastery; Legacy and Ecosystem Transformation; Innovation and Emerging Technologies; and Operational Excellence.