Celent Says

Predicting the Future Role of Actuaries in Insurance

Mike Fitzgerald
Insurance Experts' Forum, July 7, 2010

Several shifts are underway that will result in significant changes in the way that insurance companies use actuarial resources. An increase in qualified actuarial resources, and a need to move company actuaries into more strategic activities will offer opportunities that have previously been unavailable. The exact timing and pace of this change is uncertain, but the economics are so compelling that I think it is not a question of if, but when, a new model will prevail.

First, over 10,000 people in India are currently sitting for the actuarial exams. As the result of the growth in the knowledge worker outsourcing industry, and the privatization of the Indian insurance industry, actuarial studies are now much more attractive to qualified students. Scarcity (read: price), will be reduced as a result of this increasing supply of expertise.

Second, companies increasingly need to apply their internal actuarial talent to more strategic activities such as sophisticated price modeling and risk management. Predictive modeling and multi-tier pricing require constant attention and monitoring. Existing regulation in Europe regarding Solvency II consumes increasing amounts of resource. Both of these activities are best performed in-house.

Leading companies will recognize that the traditional insurance product pricing process can be separated into separate activities, some of which can be outsourced. For example, the development of loss triangles and the updating of price indications are examples of discrete, measurable work that can be effectively performed remotely. Once these tasks are complete, internal actuaries can then review them and make final, proprietary pricing decisions. Moving the tactical work offshore lowers costs, and frees company resources to focus on higher value activities.

There are barriers to this transition. Tradition and inertia will slow adoption. It may take seven to 10 years, but the cost advantages and a need to redirect company talent will eventually result in a shift the norm to a multi-source, onshore/offshore actuarial model.

This blog has been reprinted with permission from Celent.

Mike Fitzgerald is a senior analyst in Celent's insurance practice, and can be reached at mfitzgerald@celent.com.

Readers are encouraged to respond to Mike using the “Add Your Comments” box below.

The opinions posted in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Insurance Networking News or SourceMedia.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Insurance Networking News, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Blog Archive

Global Supply Chain, Local Problem

As a technology provider, your clientís ability to deliver products and services to their customers, when and where they need them, is at the heart of their business success.

Legacy Systems Are Increasingly a Competitive Handicap

Legacy systems, while reliable, increasingly hold insurers back, a new study finds

From Her to Watson, and What’s Next?

Imagine a learning system that can replace the performance of your best employee to provide the same level of support across the organization.

Five Reasons to Software-Define Your Operations

It may be possible to provision key services with the click of a mouse, but benefits go well beyond that.

3 Policy Admin Conversion Considerations

Insurers would be wise to learn these lessons before formulating a strategy to convert policies to a new policy administration system.

Boyle’s 4th Law - Response Time Matters!

Why many companies donít do a good job of measuring the thing that clients value the most.