Celent Says

3-for-1: Increased Profits, Employee Retention, Service Quality

Mike Fitzgerald
Insurance Experts' Forum, September 22, 2011

I participated in a very interesting discussion concerning work-from-home customer support professionals at last week’s LOMA Polilcyholder Service Conference. Approximately 30 customer service executives and managers shared their best practices in call-center management.

One of the more striking conversation threads was the experience companies are having with home-based service representatives – call-center employees that provide customer support from their homes. The most common approach mentioned is to use this model selectively with proven high performers and as a motivation and retention tool. But, it was also clear from the specific examples that there are meaningful business benefits to be gained. Here are a few selected comments:

· The consensus in the room was that work-from-home reps were 25 percent more productive than their office-bound counterparts. Call center monitoring tools allow service work to be measured very precisely, giving this estimate a high level of credibility.

· Although not as scientific-based, there was agreement that the quality of home-based workers was higher. Some of this may be attributable to the fact that those chosen for this model are star performers to begin with.

· One regional, Philadelphia-based insurer reported that their distributed workforce allowed them to remain in operation during last winter’s snowstorm. Their physical call center was closed for two days.

· The cost to the insurer of a home technology set-up averaged around $5,000. At one company, the employee bore the entire expense of needed equipment.

· Companies reported that they managed expectations and clarified responsibilities through the use of a formal, written contract signed by the employees participating in the program.

This was a powerful example of the combination of technology and flexible workforce management that leads to decreased costs, increased quality and decreased operational risk.

This blog has been reprinted with permission from Celent.

Mike Fitzgerald is a senior analyst in Celent's insurance practice, and can be reached at mfitzgerald@celent.com.

Readers are encouraged to respond to Mike using the “Add Your Comments” box below.

The opinions posted in this blog do not necessarily reflect those of Insurance Networking News or SourceMedia.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Insurance Networking News, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Blog Archive

With Google Favoring Mobile, Will The Industry Take it Seriously?

Google’s search engine will now will favor mobile friendly content over traditional website content; within the insurance industry, the greatest initial impact is likely to be felt by insurance distributors.

Why Some Technologists Get Cold Feet on Mobile

There are those who believe that favoring one channel or mode over another will lead to even more silos and dysfunction than we already have in many organizations.

Insurance IT Spending and Budgeting Benchmarks

New research from Novarica highlights areas of concern and offers insights on insurers spending and budgeting decisions.

Enterprise Mobilemania Continues Unabated

More than half of companies are spending more on developing mobile applications -- but are they more efficient?

Why Insurers Need More Than a Policy Admin System

For some insurers, not being able to handle the volume of quotes that are being submitted to them means leaving significant money on the table.

The Pitfalls of Using Assembly Line Methods to Create Software

Most of the time, when the business needs IT, it is for custom software development, just like creating a concept car.