Editors' Cuts

Frustration Sets in as Wait for Regulatory Rules Remains Indefinite

Justin Stephani
Insurance Experts' Forum, April 16, 2013

Nearly two years ago, a study released by the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI) made the claim that P&C insurers did not pose a systemic threat to financial markets or the broader economy.

Eighteen months ago, the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) issued five “thresholds that will help determine which non-bank institutions will come under the purview of the Federal Reserve.”

Last week, MetLife chairman, president and CEO Steve Kandarian spoke out in opposition of life insurers being named systemically important financial institutions, as MetLife has been on the FSOC’s radar for a potential SIFI designation.

In the past two years under Dodd-Frank, not much seems to have happened. Sure, Roy Woodall was nominated as an insurance representative on the board that is formulating the rules regarding systemic risk, the Insurance Information Institute’s Bob Hartwig has appeared before subcommittees defending the stability of the insurance marketplace, and insurers, industry experts, academics and trade groups have been speaking up on behalf of the industry.

But the most common thread of discussion through the past two years has undoubtedly been one of simultaneous confidence in the industry and frustration when it comes to likelihood of more regulation, which is why patience is running a little thin. Not to mention the fact that many insurers have already been trimming operations of their own volition after the economic crisis; in particular, larger insurers who have divested units and separated brands, with the hope of avoiding any potential dual regulation that could pop up down the line. Yet, the lack of answers persists.

“The longer things remain uncertain, the more pressure that puts on the industry,” said Howard Mills, director and chief advisor of Deloitte’s insurance industry group and former New York State Insurance superintendent. “It’s sort of an artificial cloud hanging over the industry’s head; what’s going to happen with SIFI designations, what’s going to be in the FIO report? There’s just so much uncertainty out there.”

The Federal Insurance Office (FIO) is a tangential pipeline of frustration for insurers, as the unit created by Dodd-Frank has been all but silent publicly as its official report is almost 18 months late. Seemingly because it knew it couldn’t please all parties, the group has moved on and begun working with the various organizations putting the rules together without presenting a game plan to the industry it’s supposed to be representing.

“I think the industry would like to have clarity, even if it’s a regulatory announcement or a determination that they don’t agree with—it’s better to know than to not know,” said Mills. Before explaining that, when news does surface, it probably won’t be agreeable: “I think there’s an element of politics here, and I’m not speaking specifically with regard to MetLife, but just generally speaking, there’s a political expectation that some insurers are probably going to get swept up into this—not justifiably on the merits, but it’ll be hard for the industry to escape the whole.”

So while insurers have had plenty of time to adjust operations accordingly (or at least make plans to) and have likely come back to waiting, the usefulness of the eventual announcements reasserts itself at the center of the debate.

Indeed, Mills summed up the regulatory updates, and therefore the last two years, succinctly when he ended our discussion by saying: “It’s getting a little ridiculous in terms of the pace.”

Justin Stephani is associate editor for Insurance Networking News.

Readers are encouraged to respond to Justin by using the “Add Your Comments” box below. Healso can be reached at justin.stephani@sourcemedia.com.

This blog was exclusively written for Insurance Networking News. It may not be reposted or reused without permission from Insurance Networking News.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Insurance Networking News, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Blog Archive

The Software-Defined Health Insurer: Radical But Realistic?

Can a tech startup digitally assemble the pieces of a comprehensive, employer-provided health plan?

Data Governance in Insurance Carriers

As the insurance industry moves into a more data-centric world, data governance becomes more critical for ensuring the data is consistent, reliable and usable for analysis.

Fear This

Just days before this Issue, which contains our security cover story, went to press, we got some interesting news: 1.2 billion unique usernames and passwords and 542 million email addresses were reportedly stolen from 420,000 websites, according to The New York Times. The websites ranged from Fortune 500 companies down to small online retailers.

Should You Back Up Enterprise Data to the Cloud?

Six questions that need to be asked before signing on with an outside service.

Modernizing Information Management

While better reporting and actuarial analysis help to support financial decisions, improved analytics and decision making greatly assist the rest of the organization.

Strategic Planning: Here and Now

Insurers’ annual strategic planning efforts can benefit from an infusion of tactical reality.

Advertisement

Advertisement