Enterprising Developments

Freedom From Hardware, One Application at a Time

Joe McKendrick
Insurance Experts' Forum, January 17, 2013

Can software-defined data centers help relieve today's congested and overtaxed data centers? That's the hope of many vendors and analysts, who see this emerging approach as a way to finally wrest control of data center operations from the historical limitations of servers, storage arrays and network equipment.

“Is a software-defined data center just existing physical assets with more virtualized aspects, or is it something revolutionary?” asks Patrick Kerpan in a recent post in Wired.

At their core, software-defined data centers are a key piece of private clouds—they abstract data center operations and functions away from underlying hardware. “The deployment and management of applications and the virtualized compute, storage and networks they are comprised of should exist only as software,”

As Kerpan puts it: “Let someone else own the hardware, the guards, the glass, the gas, the batteries, the generators, and the hundreds of people who service them in the world of enterprise IT. We would even advise considering managing infrastructure IT and application IT as very different organization—and to the extreme, never the two shall meet, except for in the form of APIs and the contractual relationships engendered in their use.”

Many organizations are already on their way to software-defined data centers, whether they are actively pursuing it or not. The bottom line is that no one needs to attempt to move their entire data center to being software defined. The process occurs one application at a time. “Dramatic action doesn’t need to be pursued,” says Kerpan. “The ubiquity of APIs, automation, Internet, and 'fast, flat, and fat' physical resources means software-defined data center can be pursued now and deliver ROI one application at a time, not one physical data center at a time.”

The components of a software defined data center will consist of network virtualization, image automation, topology automation, and file system virtualization.

Joe McKendrick is an author, consultant, blogger and frequent INN contributor specializing in information technology.

Readers are encouraged to respond to Joe using the “Add Your Comments” box below. He can also be reached at joe@mckendrickresearch.com.

This blog was exclusively written for Insurance Networking News. It may not be reposted or reused without permission from Insurance Networking News.

The opinions of bloggers on www.insurancenetworking.com do not necessarily reflect those of Insurance Networking News.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Insurance Networking News, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Blog Archive

Living with the Internet of Things (and crowd funding)

The Internet of Things has it’s teething problems.

6 Technology Priorities for Individual Life Carriers

While many aging, generally mainframe-based systems, remain capable of supporting basic policy processing and accounting functions, the costs associated with enhancing them are becoming increasingly problematic.

With Google Favoring Mobile, Will The Industry Take it Seriously?

Google’s search engine will now will favor mobile friendly content over traditional website content; within the insurance industry, the greatest initial impact is likely to be felt by insurance distributors.

Why Some Technologists Get Cold Feet on Mobile

There are those who believe that favoring one channel or mode over another will lead to even more silos and dysfunction than we already have in many organizations.

Insurance IT Spending and Budgeting Benchmarks

New research from Novarica highlights areas of concern and offers insights on insurers spending and budgeting decisions.

Enterprise Mobilemania Continues Unabated

More than half of companies are spending more on developing mobile applications -- but are they more efficient?