Enterprising Developments

When Data Goes Against the Grain

Joe McKendrick
Insurance Experts' Forum, April 20, 2012

Customer lifetime profitability is one of the holy grails of analytics, and companies are often surprised when they see data that goes against what they assumed was gospel for their business. Like when a bank discovers that its high-income customers aren’t the most profitable. Or the insurance company that extends discount rates to hang on to marginal customers that end up defecting to a low-cost Internet provider anyway.

The question is, how do you know when a customer costs more to keep than to simply let go? There's conventional wisdom, or a sacrosanct rule of business, that the name of the game is expanding and acquiring as many new customers as possible. Analytics is seen as the way forward to cracking open new markets, but analytic tools can also show you where you may be better off closing markets.

Tibco's Brett Stupakevich recently posted an interesting perspective on this role of analytics that goes against the grain. He points out that new analytics technology—embedded within customer relationship management solutions—can scale down your reach to certain customer segments as much as it helps to scale up sales.

Brett provides three key metrics that help determine whether a customer is worth chasing:

- Cost to acquire: “Does a customer’s buying patterns justify the cost to acquire him?” CRM analytics can quickly provide actionable insight from disparate data sources to answer this question.

- Cost to retain: “It might be time to fire one of your customers if the cost to maintain his business—through excessive use of your call center or a record of paying late—exceeds the money he spends on your goods or services.”

- Cost to woo: “CRM analytics can show a marketing department if its campaigns are paying off.”

The bottom line is that by using analytics to unearth unprofitable customers, energy and resources can be spent on segments that are generating most of the revenue. It sounds like sales and marketing 101, but until now, the gut reaction has been to try to keep every customer as long as possible. Data analytics has changed the game.

Joe McKendrick is an author, consultant, blogger and frequent INN contributor specializing in information technology.

Readers are encouraged to respond to Joe using the “Add Your Comments” box below. He can also be reached at joe@mckendrickresearch.com.

This blog was exclusively written for Insurance Networking News. It may not be reposted or reused without permission from Insurance Networking News.

The opinions of bloggers on www.insurancenetworking.com do not necessarily reflect those of Insurance Networking News.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Insurance Networking News, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Blog Archive

To Quantify or Not — That is the Question with Modernization

Making the quantitative case is a long-practiced ritual in many insurance organizations.

3 Reasons DevOps Matters

Every insurer needs to compete on products and information turned around in light-speed fashion.

Coordinate Coverages to Manage Social Media Exposures

The bottom line is that no one policy will cover all the exposures in the social media realm.

The Internet of Things: Helping Insurers Make Better-Informed Decisions about Risk

The IoT is a major game changer for the insurance industry, and will likely affect every part of the insurance value chain. After all, insurance is data-driven, and that’s exactly what the IoT can deliver—relevant, actionable, real-time data that can provide an accurate picture of what is being—or may be—insured.

Software-Defined Everything

What does it take to virtualize all the key components in your data center?

On Thanking the Regulator … Really

The Financial Conduct Authority is demanding higher standards of consumer protection from insurers, which could lead to greater customer engagement and understanding.

Advertisement

Advertisement